Over the past few posts, I’ve been focusing on the NCAA tournament, simulating games based on predicted efficiency statistics. For the Sweet Sixteen predictions below, I ran 8,000 simulations for each game. I list my predicted winner (including 7 Florida over 3 Marquette), and the predicted efficiency statistics. The stats are based on Dean Oliver’s four factors:
- Factor 1: 3 pt shooting %, 2 pt shooting %, foul shooting %
- Factor 2: % of potential offensive rebs secured (including balls out of bounds)
- Factor 3: % of offensive plays ending in a turnover
- Factor 4: 3 pt attempts as a % of non-turnover plays, 2 pt attempts as a % of non-TO plays, free throw trips as a % of non-TO plays
Factor 4 is the most confusing. It’s similar to Oliver’s FTA/FGA factor, but has more value for simulations, since it tells me how often teams get a three point attempt, a two point attempt, or a trip to the line (on plays without a turnover).
1 Kentucky, 4 Indiana Favorite: Kentucky (wins 55.3% of simulations):
- 2 pt %: 50, 46
- 3 pt %: 35, 39
- FT %: 72, 76
- OReb %: 34, 30
- TO %: 14, 14
- 2 att %: 62, 64
- 3 att %: 23, 22
- FT att %: 15, 14
3 Baylor, 10 Xavier Favorite: Baylor (76.9%):
- 2 pt %: 49, 43
- 3 pt %: 38, 33
- FT %: 75, 69
- OReb %: 34, 28
- TO %: 15, 14
- 2 att %: 56, 64
- 3 att %: 29, 22
- FT att %: 15, 14
1 Michigan State, 4 Louisville Favorite: Michigan State (62.5%):
- 2 pt %: 48, 45
- 3 pt %: 35, 31
- FT %: 70, 69
- OReb %: 34, 29
- TO %: 17, 16
- 2 att %: 61, 54
- 3 att %: 24, 31
- FT att %: 15, 15
7 Florida, 3 Marquette Favorite: Florida (56.3%)
- 2 pt %: 49, 49
- 3 pt %: 36, 33
- FT %: 71, 72
- OReb %: 32, 30
- TO %: 15, 15
- 2 att %: 48, 61
- 3 att %: 39, 25
- FT att %: 13, 15
1 Syracuse, 4 Wisconsin Favorite: Syracuse (56.6%, no Melo adjustment)
- 2 pt %: 48, 44
- 3 pt %: 33, 34
- FT %: 69, 74
- OReb %: 31, 30
- TO %: 12, 15
- 2 att %: 65, 49
- 3 att %: 24, 38
- FT att %: 11, 13
2 Ohio State, 6 Cincinnati Favorite: Ohio State (65.7%)
- 2 pt %: 52, 44
- 3 pt %: 32, 33
- FT %: 70, 64
- OReb %: 33, 28
- TO %: 15, 14
- 2 att %: 66, 55
- 3 att %: 23, 33
- FT att %: 12, 12
1 North Carolina, 13 Ohio Favorite: North Carolina (87.1%)
- 2 pt %: 53, 41
- 3 pt %: 34, 29
- FT %: 68, 68
- OReb %: 39, 27
- TO %: 17, 14
- 2 att %: 62, 54
- 3 att %: 21, 37
- FT att %: 17, 9
2 Kansas, 11 North Carolina State Favorite: Kansas (62.1%)
- 2 pt %: 52, 46
- 3 pt %: 34, 34
- FT %: 70, 71
- OReb %: 30, 30
- TO %: 14, 15
- 2 att %: 59, 63
- 3 att %: 26, 23
- FT att %: 15, 14

Pingback: John Calipari on 2012 NCAA bracket | TrendSurfer