Yesterday, Adrian reasserted himself on the blog with a clear proposal to reduce diving in soccer. Today, he shows off his versatility with a response to my recent thoughts on fairness in U.S. and European professional sports leagues (written in relation to my brother Conor’s defense of talent concentration in European soccer). For a taste of the historical, economic, legal, and political, set aside 10 minutes and read on:
How long has it been? Too long, I think. But Tyler’s recent post has compelled me to withdraw from my self-imposed hibernation and away from the stultifying process of studying for the Ontario bar exam. In short, I disagree with the capitalist/socialist, American Sports/European Sports dichotomy or, rather, I think it abstracts away from the real issue – that cartels make a heck of a lot more money than entities that exist in competition with one another. In short, the NFL and MLB are not staunch defenders of equality values; Dan Snyder and Hank Steinbrenner are not driving the train to the Finland Station.
The standard argument goes something like this: isn’t it ironic that America, land of unbridled capitalism, home of animal spirits on free and open fields, has “socialist” sports leagues that redistribute resources from winners to losers while red, socialist, pinko Europe has a free and open market for sports talent? It’s a cute argument and one that elicits a nice “hmmm…” from readers and there are certainly large elements of truth to it. American sports are, at least nominally, more redistributive, and there is a larger perception that American sports are organized more “fairly” than European sports from a competitive standpoint. Still, it’s far from clear that European sports are more aristocratic than American sports if we look at the highest levels and, more importantly, I think this distracts us from a deeper, more thorough comparison of why European sports and American sports are organized so differently.
Barcelona’s greatness is undeniable, but it’s not a greatness that has translated into a dynasty at the highest levels of competition. While Barca has been the dominant team in La Liga, it’s only won three of the last ten Champions League titles despite making each of the last ten tournaments. This means that the Champions League may not even be as “aristocratic” as the NBA: eight different teams have won the Champions League while only six have won the NBA championship in the same span. And, unlike La Liga Continue reading →
Posted in Baseball, Basketball, College Sports, Commentary, Financial Analysis, Football, Hockey, Other Sports, Rules Analysis, Soccer
Tagged 1920s robber barons, Adrian the Canadian, American sports capitalist, animal spirits, anti-monopoly legislation, antitrust rules sports, antitrust rulings sports, aristocratic sports teams, Barca, Barcelona, baseball, basketball, BCS, Big Ten network, boxing, capitalism in sports, capitalism sports, cartels, CBS, Champions League, Chelsea, collective bargaining agreements sports, Conor Williams, court rulings sports, Dan Snyder, diving in soccer, Edmonton Oilers 1980s, European Football Super League, European soccer fairness, european sports, European sports leagues, fairness in sports, Federal Baseball Club v. National League, finland station, Flood v. Kuhn, Flood v. Kuhn controversy, football, free agency, Hank Steinbrenner, hockey, L.A. Kings, La Liga, Miami Heat, MLB, monopolies, NBA, NCAA, New York Yankees, NFL, NFL broadcasting rules, NHL, NHL playoffs random, Ontario bar exam, Pac-12 network, professional sports leagues, redistribution in sports, SEC, SEC on CBS, soccer, soccer today, socialism in sports, Sports, Sports Broadcasting Act, sports cartels, sports leagues cartels, sports leagues monopolies, sports unions, too much diving in soccer, U.S. Congress, U.S. sports leagues, U.S. sports leagues are more fair, U.S. Supreme Court, U.S. Supreme Court sports rulings, U.S. vs European sports leagues, UEFA, unionization sports
Part 2: The Return of Adrian the Canadian
Yesterday, Adrian reasserted himself on the blog with a clear proposal to reduce diving in soccer. Today, he shows off his versatility with a response to my recent thoughts on fairness in U.S. and European professional sports leagues (written in relation to my brother Conor’s defense of talent concentration in European soccer). For a taste of the historical, economic, legal, and political, set aside 10 minutes and read on:
How long has it been? Too long, I think. But Tyler’s recent post has compelled me to withdraw from my self-imposed hibernation and away from the stultifying process of studying for the Ontario bar exam. In short, I disagree with the capitalist/socialist, American Sports/European Sports dichotomy or, rather, I think it abstracts away from the real issue – that cartels make a heck of a lot more money than entities that exist in competition with one another. In short, the NFL and MLB are not staunch defenders of equality values; Dan Snyder and Hank Steinbrenner are not driving the train to the Finland Station.
The standard argument goes something like this: isn’t it ironic that America, land of unbridled capitalism, home of animal spirits on free and open fields, has “socialist” sports leagues that redistribute resources from winners to losers while red, socialist, pinko Europe has a free and open market for sports talent? It’s a cute argument and one that elicits a nice “hmmm…” from readers and there are certainly large elements of truth to it. American sports are, at least nominally, more redistributive, and there is a larger perception that American sports are organized more “fairly” than European sports from a competitive standpoint. Still, it’s far from clear that European sports are more aristocratic than American sports if we look at the highest levels and, more importantly, I think this distracts us from a deeper, more thorough comparison of why European sports and American sports are organized so differently.
Barcelona’s greatness is undeniable, but it’s not a greatness that has translated into a dynasty at the highest levels of competition. While Barca has been the dominant team in La Liga, it’s only won three of the last ten Champions League titles despite making each of the last ten tournaments. This means that the Champions League may not even be as “aristocratic” as the NBA: eight different teams have won the Champions League while only six have won the NBA championship in the same span. And, unlike La Liga Continue reading →
Leave a comment
Posted in Baseball, Basketball, College Sports, Commentary, Financial Analysis, Football, Hockey, Other Sports, Rules Analysis, Soccer
Tagged 1920s robber barons, Adrian the Canadian, American sports capitalist, animal spirits, anti-monopoly legislation, antitrust rules sports, antitrust rulings sports, aristocratic sports teams, Barca, Barcelona, baseball, basketball, BCS, Big Ten network, boxing, capitalism in sports, capitalism sports, cartels, CBS, Champions League, Chelsea, collective bargaining agreements sports, Conor Williams, court rulings sports, Dan Snyder, diving in soccer, Edmonton Oilers 1980s, European Football Super League, European soccer fairness, european sports, European sports leagues, fairness in sports, Federal Baseball Club v. National League, finland station, Flood v. Kuhn, Flood v. Kuhn controversy, football, free agency, Hank Steinbrenner, hockey, L.A. Kings, La Liga, Miami Heat, MLB, monopolies, NBA, NCAA, New York Yankees, NFL, NFL broadcasting rules, NHL, NHL playoffs random, Ontario bar exam, Pac-12 network, professional sports leagues, redistribution in sports, SEC, SEC on CBS, soccer, soccer today, socialism in sports, Sports, Sports Broadcasting Act, sports cartels, sports leagues cartels, sports leagues monopolies, sports unions, too much diving in soccer, U.S. Congress, U.S. sports leagues, U.S. sports leagues are more fair, U.S. Supreme Court, U.S. Supreme Court sports rulings, U.S. vs European sports leagues, UEFA, unionization sports